Toward
the end of World War II, Adolf Hitler had quite obviously gone mad. It was a process that began years ago. Some of his generals remarked that he was
moving around units on a large map that no longer existed. He was screaming out orders to destroy enemy
units and resources but no longer had the manpower to do so. Generals were afraid to tell him otherwise
and merely affirmed his orders and left.
Since those last days of that horrible war, a singular man controlled
the northern part of the Korean peninsula – Kim Il-sung. Today, his grandson, Kim Jung-un, has
continued the tradition of global provocateur that has further isolated a
nuclear pariah.
Over
his time as sole dictator and quasi-deity, the father of what would later be
termed the “hermit kingdom” worked as an agitator. As an extension of the Cold War maneuvering,
Il-sung enjoyed the protection of Russia and China and therefore, his reckless
behavior culminating with the Korean War was supported and his image at home
reinforced. His regime was also
responsible for, conservatively, over one million killings. His death in 1994 brought to power his son,
Kim Jung-il. While his time in control
of North Korea contained gestures towards its southern neighbor and even talk
of re-unification, it was difficult to take these overtures seriously. As party secretary prior to 1994, South Korea
blamed him for ordering a bombing in Rangoon, Myanmar and the downing of Korean
Air Flight 858 in 1987. Now, his son is
playing a dangerous game with nuclear weapons.
His nearby enemies (namely South Korea and Japan) are nervous, as are
his “friends” (namely China).
On
one level, there is no evidence that North Korea has the technology to strike
the United States. However, the U.S. has
long standing alliances with South Korea and Japan and because of this
relationship, we are obliged to help in the event of a North Korean
attack. The president has wisely ordered
various maneuverings in South Korea using stealth bombers and it is assumed
that enhanced missile shields are forthcoming.
All of these are defensive and reactionary in nature. There will be a time when the president will
be forced to consider a pre-emptive strike upon intelligence that North Korea
is prepared to do something. If Jung-un
appears to be ready to act upon his countless threats, the U.S. will need to
decide if it should truncate the threat potential. Japan’s military is defensive in nature and
not equipped for a pre-emptive strike.
South Korea possesses a large military with plenty of weapons to destroy
its northern neighbor but history has not shown that it is willing to take
chances.
It
is uncertain what explains this recent round of saber-rattling. Perhaps it was Dennis Rodman’s fault. However, Pyongyang has made a habit of this
over the last couple of decades – threaten nuclear war or missile attack, pleas
from the West asking him to relax and donate supplies and food to make the
point, North Korea backs off…for a while.
What generally helps the United States and a president decide how to
address a crisis is an underlying trust that the opposite leader will not do
certain things. Those types of
assumptions are dangerously played with regards to North Korea. Israel, faced with a similar threat, took the
initiative to destroy nuclear power plants in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in
2007. Israel is not in a position to
allow for diplomacy to run its course – its existence lies upon the blade of
the sword. If Japan or South Korea is
not willing to do it, it would be a safer option for the U.S. to strike first
than to respond.
China
has lost control of its younger, demented communist brother and even it and
Russia have supported increased sanctions by the United Nations. However, the combination of North Korea’s
dangerous abilities and the unknown factor of the newly appointed Kim Jung-un
is a bad combination. North Korea is
more dangerous than even a country like Iran.
Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is countered by the Supreme
Leader, Ali Khamenei. Where Iran has
that religious check on secular power, North Korea’s cult of personality
combines the political with the religious.
The hold that this type of government has on its people is dangerous and
only increases the volatility and danger of a country.
No comments:
Post a Comment