Russian
president Vladimir Putin has been juggling a great deal of late – Syria, the
Ukraine, domestic dissenters, terrorist attacks, the Olympics, treason and gay
rights. He has inserted himself into
these issues like a man without enough to do.
Advantageously or not, he has entered into frays in an attempt to bring
Russia once more to the fore. As Benito
Mussolini sought to re-create the Roman Empire, Mr. Putin wants to bring back
the glory and the relevance of the Soviet Union. What has emerged is a portrait of a man who
does not have a master plan so much as an instinctual drive to matter once
more.
In
the Ukraine, it has been a battle between a government who is beholden to and
admiring of the heavy-handed example of Russian rule while its people are
desperate to be a part of the European Union.
The people have been staging one massive demonstration after another to
demand entrance into the more economically prosperous West. Mr. Putin doled out $15 billion that he will
likely never see again, saving the Ukraine for the moment, but to what end?
Concurrently,
gay activists are primed to make their point with the upcoming Olympics but the
president’s anti-gay stance is not controversial in a largely conservative
country. Additionally, while the
Russians may be attacked by the more liberal West on the subject, few other
countries are making waves on the subject, so why stir the pot? The moral litmus test that Mr. Putin seems to
be suggesting was made after the fact and is further proof that no grand master
plan exists for the president.
The
Edward Snowden affair has made more than a few observers and leaders scratch
their heads as the incident does nothing for Mr. Putin. There may be a deep-seated Russian DNA that
requires agitating and embarrassing the Americans but Mr. Snowden is no Kim
Philby or Alger Hiss. In the world of
international relations and espionage, it would appear that only the naïve Mr.
Snowden thought he had something noteworthy on his hands. The fact that the conscious-stricken traitor
has taken or tried to take refuge with three oppressive regimes (Russia, China
and Venezuela) further diminishes his importance and message.
However,
the two things the Russian leadership knows about are dealing with internal dissention
and throwing a parade. Yet, the world
has changed and even this has proven difficult.
First, Russia made headlines with the imprisonment of the crude, albeit
impactful message of the punk band Pussy Riot.
While the Russians have traveled through the cauldron of glasnost, the
government has limits. Back in the day,
the three young women would have disappeared and no one would have been wiser
but the women have gone viral and they have become impossible to ignore. Their recent release from jail by the “benevolent”
Mr. Putin was seen as the cynical gesture it was and further proof that the
president had little idea how to cope.
Then,
there are the Olympics. Twentieth-century
Russian/Soviet history has shown the importance of putting on a show. Yet, the terrorist attacks in Volgograd
threaten to bring down in horrific fashion Russia’s plans to present an
athletically dominant and culturally significant image to the world. No doubt, Mr. Putin, a la Captain Renault, is
rounding up the usual suspects but the fact that fears linger and uncertainties
are rising is proof that the Russians are not quite as efficient at crushing
dissent and “troublemakers” as before.
While one may assume that the lack of more recent attacks is a sign of
Russia’s determination, the Chechens are not known for sustained violence –
only attacks that are sporadic and spectacular.
An attack at the Olympics would certainly fit the modus operandi.
Vladimir
Putin is an anachronism who is trying to portray his measures under the guise
of a modern veneer. Much like to tax and
to please, this tactic is quite untenable.
If the president can have a safe and, for the Russians, a successful
Olympics, the country will no doubt benefit but it will not be based on any
grand master plan on the part of Mr. Putin.
As Julia Ioffe of the New Republic
put it, this is a man thinking and acting instinctively, not deliberately. While he is hoping that is enough, hope alone
has seldom accomplished great things.
No comments:
Post a Comment