As
we enter 2015, here is an obligatory look ahead of some of the major issues
that the United States might deal with over the next year. Hopefully, it is not only the U.S. but given
the trend over the last decade or so, international cooperation has been
difficult to secure. For those who
blamed the overly aggressive approach of President Bush as being divisive,
President Obama’s overly conciliatory approach has won fewer friends. In fact, many countries have lost faith in
the U.S. and it is a faith that will be further tested over the next year.
Even
as it was happening, many observers thought Vladimir Putin’s reach for Crimea
and eastern Ukraine was an attempt to divert the Russian public’s attention
away from the downward spiraling economy.
It is an economy that has grown progressively worse over the last six
months. With the recent collapse of the
ruble, the Russian economy could be sinking at depths that even the
nationalistic land grab of Crimea and the Ukraine might fail to obfuscate. That means, providing that Mr. Putin does not
engage in a complete change in thought process, the large Russian minority
population in the Baltic States could make the countries of Latvia, Lithuania
and Estonia the next susceptible targets of Russian aggression.
A
second hot spot is an oldie but a goodie – the Middle East. Just as Tunisia selected recently its first
democratically elected leader, other members of the now defunct Arab Spring are
examples of dictatorial and ruthless leadership hanging on. Whether one is talking about Iran or Syria or
Yemen (and there are many others), the Middle East will remain a tinderbox in
the foreseeable future. There seems to
be a growing albeit still incompetent voice in the Arab world against the ISIS
of the world and their death fetish vision of how society should develop. However, the horrific crimes of ISIS as well
as the ghastly attack on the school in Pakistan by the Taliban are bringing new
attention to a region and its acceptance (tacit or otherwise) of such tactics.
On
the continent of Africa, there are several incidents brewing that could lead to
disastrous consequences, whether the U.S. finds an interest to intervene or
not. The situation in South Sudan is a
cauldron of hatred and seemingly unresolvable conflicts that have resisted
strong efforts from the U.S., China and the occasional self-aggrandized actors
who have tried to sponsor one peace effort after another. An even worse situation is that in the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Its
lack of control in the east, the lack of follow through with promises of reform
by President Joseph Kabila and Hutus and other forces from Rwanda have made
this country one on the precipice. The
African Union is not keen to interfere and the worsening miasma threatens the
entire region. This does not even
mention other problem spots, such as the terrorist-laden Nigeria.
Of
course, the usual suspects like China, North Korea and Iran et al. are a
perpetual threat to regional and world peace.
In short, there are plenty of things that could cause the death and
suffering of millions and certainly, the U.S. need to make their voice heard
throughout the world and make a stand for our philosophies. The president feels reluctant to play a
larger, stronger hand in world affairs but previous presidents had warned
against isolationism. In a quote
strangely enough quoted by President Obama in his book The Audacity of Hope, Theodore Roosevelt said “We have no choice…as
to whether or not we shall play a great part in the world. That has been determined to us by fate, by
the march of events…All that we can decide is whether we shall play it well or
ill.”
No comments:
Post a Comment