If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.
Noam Chomsky
In recent weeks, a row has emerged from the owner of the National Basketball Association’s Los Angeles Clippers – Donald Sterling. He’s the longest serving owner in the NBA but due to a couple of well-publicized incidents, he has often been thought of (when he was thought of) as a buffoon. Last week, a secretly recorded tape showcased Mr. Sterling’s backward thinking and racism. In the aftermath, the commissioner of the NBA, Adam Silver, banned him for life and is attempting to force the sale of his club to the league so that they may seek a more suitable owner. As ridiculous as Mr. Sterling’s comments were, I’m confused and alarmed by the action taken and the players’ reaction to the owner.
Noam Chomsky
In recent weeks, a row has emerged from the owner of the National Basketball Association’s Los Angeles Clippers – Donald Sterling. He’s the longest serving owner in the NBA but due to a couple of well-publicized incidents, he has often been thought of (when he was thought of) as a buffoon. Last week, a secretly recorded tape showcased Mr. Sterling’s backward thinking and racism. In the aftermath, the commissioner of the NBA, Adam Silver, banned him for life and is attempting to force the sale of his club to the league so that they may seek a more suitable owner. As ridiculous as Mr. Sterling’s comments were, I’m confused and alarmed by the action taken and the players’ reaction to the owner.
There
are two major things about this whole fiasco that bother me. The first is the nature of the comments and
the league’s reaction to the same. So
that my affiliation is clear, I don’t subscribe to Mr. Sterling’s point of
view. He is like the drunk uncle at
family gatherings whose embarrassing paradigm is stuck about sixty years in the
past. That said, the NBA’s actions are a
bit dangerous to me. In my perfect
world, people like Mr. Sterling are taken care of by the market and its refusal
to patronize his product. However, not
many people, let alone sports fans, have the courage of their convictions when
their “team” is the question. So, they
want somebody else to do something. In
steps the commissioner.
Mr.
Silver laid down the law that Donald Sterling’s words, secretly recorded in the
privacy of his own home, are grounds for immediate and indefinite
suspension. However, my problem has to
do with the basis for the commissioner’s actions. As Dallas Mavericks’ owner Mark Cuban said,
it is not against the law to be stupid and backwards. So, what is the fallout if you make it a crime? Some might say, what is wrong with taking
action against a racist? The problem is
that it seldom stops there. History
shows us that people with the power to control the masses begin with the agreed
upon. People feel comfortable with the
first salvos – who is going to defend the actions of a racist? Yet, it is a slippery slope and I’m concerned
about the precedent set.
The
other matter that I do not understand is the reaction from the players and
observers. It seems we are giving way
too much attention to the thoughts and actions of an 80-year-old, publically
insignificant figure that people wrote off as a joke years ago. Players turning their jersey inside out in
protest – I want to know the individual who, prior to, connected the name
“Clippers” only to Donald Sterling and not the men on the court. Players emotionally declared the level of
hurt and pain this has caused.
Unfortunately, it is likely these young men have suffered in the past
from racism. This is the worst? The private ramblings of a marginalized man
has caused this much distress and emotion?
I would suggest to you this man has never been given so much attention
in his life.
I
don’t have the answer to racism. Yet the
attention paid to Mr. Sterling is disproportionate to its impact. Additionally, when an organization can punish
thought and privately expressed thought at that, what does that mean? As a Jew, I learned early that even the neo-Nazis
should be able to speak their mind publicly.
Forbidden speech is emboldened speech.
The protection of speech, certainly what is said in the privacy of one’s
home, is paramount in a free society.
Racists and others of their ilk, in a free society, will face
condemnation and marginalization. The
actions of the NBA commissioner borders on the tyranny of the majority and in
the end could prove just as destructive as the racists.
No comments:
Post a Comment