The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of authorities must be moderated and controlled...if a nation doesn't want to go bankrupt.
Over the last couple of weeks, the news coverage in the United States has been extraordinarily obsessed with talks about the budget cuts, sequestration and the blame game noted by the near apocalyptic visions of a post-sequestered world that seemed to keep the president up at night. I dare say that little can compare to the degree in which the world will fall apart and off its axis if the howling of the congressional Democrats and the president are to be believed. Only in the last few days has President Obama returned the land of the sane and reasonable with his declaration that the majority of Americans will likely not notice the budget cuts. What would have happened if this approach had been the norm over the last couple of months?
Cicero, 55 BCE
Over the last couple of weeks, the news coverage in the United States has been extraordinarily obsessed with talks about the budget cuts, sequestration and the blame game noted by the near apocalyptic visions of a post-sequestered world that seemed to keep the president up at night. I dare say that little can compare to the degree in which the world will fall apart and off its axis if the howling of the congressional Democrats and the president are to be believed. Only in the last few days has President Obama returned the land of the sane and reasonable with his declaration that the majority of Americans will likely not notice the budget cuts. What would have happened if this approach had been the norm over the last couple of months?
Beginning with the Christmas holiday
hand wringing that set up this due date, people have discussed this in the most
extreme terms. As congressional
Republicans began pushing their leadership to let the cuts happen in hopes of
getting some spending reduction, the Democrats responded with lamentations
worthy of Jeremiah. The $85b of spending
cuts from a $3.6t budget represents not even 3% of the federal budget. I dare say that most Americans do not
understand such objections over 3% when they have had to cut much worse on a
family level. Meanwhile, in a world
where one country after another is suffering the horrible effects of a debt-ridden
economy, it is surprising to see the Democrats holding to the last vestiges of
a big-government philosophy. Greece,
Italy, Spain and Ireland and many others are stepping from the brink by cutting
back the role and expense of their governments.
Meanwhile, the United States is doubling down.
Throughout
American history, the government has been forced into major cuts in spending
much more severe than the one being phased in now. After World War II and during President
Reagan’s term, the government cut its spending and the economy prospered as a
result. Economically, it is considered
an axiom that as government spending decreases, private sector spending
increases as they fill the void. The
more government spends, the more it occupies the limited factors of
production. This bromide philosophy that
has been championed since the days of the Great Depression is a malum in se.
In
the final analysis, one has to consider how this plays out politically. Journalist Bob Woodward, who helped bring
down Richard Nixon, has pointedly explained that it was the Obama
administration that introduced the idea of sequestration but as the Republicans
have adopted it as their own policy, the president has ratcheted up the
rhetoric and the calamitous prognostications.
If the president’s late reversal is correct and few Americans see or
feel the spending cuts, the previous months of predictions by Democrats will
seem like a red herring and they could lose horribly in the mid-term elections
in 2014. The American people will grow
increasingly suspicious of the predictions of doom associated by Democrats of
Republican policy. Meanwhile, the
Republicans could stand to gain a great deal both in the eyes of the people and
in strengthening its hold on the Congress.
Conservatives, over the last months, have experienced the worst of
character assassination. They have been accused
as wanting to hurt small children, pregnant women, disabled veterans and nearly
anyone else the Democrats could imagine.
Is it any wonder that some Republicans questioned the wisdom of talking
to the president at all?
It
has been said before by people much smarter than me that attitude reflects
leadership. Indeed, the president has
created a vitriolic environment.
Opposing opinions are not granted much respect but rather tend to be
characterized in the worst possible terms.
A man who was swept into office on the loftiest of oratory skills has
descended into the deepest depths of vindictiveness. The Republicans, in response, have grown more
entrenched and less flexible. Ergo,
problems have prolonged much longer than necessary. After the paltry percentile of cuts is fully
realized, I hope lessons are learned but I’m not betting on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment